In a stunning display of political acrobatics, Sir Keir Starmer has once again managed to both acknowledge and completely dismiss a looming crisis simultaneously. Following a report suggesting significant tax rises are needed in the autumn budget, the Prime Minister declared he “does not recognise” the figures, a statement that is as definitive as it is utterly non-committal. It’s a masterful move, a verbal tightrope walk that allows him to stand firm while also shuffling his feet nervously on a bed of financial quicksand. The public is left wondering if “not recognising” something is the same as “not doing” it, or if it’s simply a new, more diplomatic way of saying “I’ll think about it later.”
Meanwhile, the government’s approach to international relations continues to be a lesson in creative indecision. On the one hand, Sir Keir has confirmed his intention to recognize a Palestinian state by September, a move praised by some and protested by others. On the other hand, Downing Street is now refusing to say if this recognition will happen while Hamas is in power, which is a bit like promising to go for a swim while refusing to get wet. This nuance has created a delightful state of confusion, with campaigners from all sides trying to figure out if the government is taking a stand, or just standing on one leg and hoping for the best.
Adding to the week’s rich tapestry of contradictory messaging, a minister has resigned over a rental scandal, with the Conservative Party gleefully accusing the Labour government of “endless sleaze.” Sir Keir’s response was a brief letter thanking the departing minister for her work, a glowing tribute that will no doubt be a comfort to the tenants who were allegedly exploited. It’s a classic Starmer two-step: publicly express disappointment while privately applauding the “ambitious agenda” that somehow led to this outcome. The whole situation is a perfect illustration of a government trying to be both the party of “integrity” and the party that politely says “thank you for your service” to a scandal-ridden minister.